<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When did CheckDB last run?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2008/12/22/when-did-checkdb-last-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2008/12/22/when-did-checkdb-last-run/</link>
	<description>A discussion on SQL Server</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 23:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2008/12/22/when-did-checkdb-last-run/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=180#comment-228</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, you should be running checkDB often enough that if it finds irreparable corruption, you can restore a clean backup and recover the database with acceptable data loss.

How often that is depends on your backup strategy, backup retention and acceptable data loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, you should be running checkDB often enough that if it finds irreparable corruption, you can restore a clean backup and recover the database with acceptable data loss.</p>
<p>How often that is depends on your backup strategy, backup retention and acceptable data loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tosscrosby</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2008/12/22/when-did-checkdb-last-run/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>tosscrosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=180#comment-227</guid>
		<description>By the way - Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way &#8211; Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tosscrosby</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2008/12/22/when-did-checkdb-last-run/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>tosscrosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=180#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Gail, I&#039;ve followed you on various boards (and Paul as well) and value your postings and thoughts on the whole gamut of topics. I run CHECKDB once a week (down time on Sunday&#039;s). Never had an issue BUT was wondering what is your opinion on how often this should be run?? I have backups of all kinds (full, diffs and logs) that run regurlarly and with success, and tested. However, with all the &quot;corruption&quot; threads, I can&#039;t help but think that possibly I should be running this even more frequently. Event viewer messages are checked with regularity and have been clean but I still can&#039;t help being a little skittish. Your thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gail, I&#8217;ve followed you on various boards (and Paul as well) and value your postings and thoughts on the whole gamut of topics. I run CHECKDB once a week (down time on Sunday&#8217;s). Never had an issue BUT was wondering what is your opinion on how often this should be run?? I have backups of all kinds (full, diffs and logs) that run regurlarly and with success, and tested. However, with all the &#8220;corruption&#8221; threads, I can&#8217;t help but think that possibly I should be running this even more frequently. Event viewer messages are checked with regularity and have been clean but I still can&#8217;t help being a little skittish. Your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

