<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bookmark lookup, by any other name&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/</link>
	<description>A discussion on SQL Server</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Sure, tuning this involves widening the index so that it covers the query.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, tuning this involves widening the index so that it covers the query.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedro</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-280</guid>
		<description>bottom line question if this is 97% of a cost in a query can it be better tuned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bottom line question if this is 97% of a cost in a query can it be better tuned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peso</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Peso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-279</guid>
		<description>I vote for Key Lookup.
Not only for the deprecation of SQL Server 2000, but because that&#039;s what all Lookups really are. They use a key to re-read a table and the matching values stored by keys in a worktable in TempDB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for Key Lookup.<br />
Not only for the deprecation of SQL Server 2000, but because that&#8217;s what all Lookups really are. They use a key to re-read a table and the matching values stored by keys in a worktable in TempDB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Ufford</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Ufford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I vote for bookmark look-up.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I vote for bookmark look-up.  <img src='http://sqlinthewild.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Stobbs</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Stobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-277</guid>
		<description>ooops I have a feeling this blog post may have been a result of my confusion :-) thanks for the clearing it up for me the other day. I think bookmark look-up is accepted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooops I have a feeling this blog post may have been a result of my confusion <img src='http://sqlinthewild.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  thanks for the clearing it up for me the other day. I think bookmark look-up is accepted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack D Corbett</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack D Corbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-276</guid>
		<description>I still call it a bookmark lookup, but I think you need to explain what MS calls it in each version for your audience to understand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still call it a bookmark lookup, but I think you need to explain what MS calls it in each version for your audience to understand it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kehayias</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kehayias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-275</guid>
		<description>I think Bookmark Lookup is still applicable because it encompasses the Key Lookup and the RID Lookup under one umbrella term.  The both do similar things and have an impact on performance and potential deadlocking in the database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bookmark Lookup is still applicable because it encompasses the Key Lookup and the RID Lookup under one umbrella term.  The both do similar things and have an impact on performance and potential deadlocking in the database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-274</guid>
		<description>I realised that I&#039;ve been doing the same thing, both when I present, on blog posts and on forum replies.

Didn&#039;t help at all that last time I presented, I showed an execution plan and started talking about the key lookups, then realised (after several people in the audience looked confused) that my demo machine was SQL 2005 RTM and the exec plan clearly showed a clustered index seek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realised that I&#8217;ve been doing the same thing, both when I present, on blog posts and on forum replies.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t help at all that last time I presented, I showed an execution plan and started talking about the key lookups, then realised (after several people in the audience looked confused) that my demo machine was SQL 2005 RTM and the exec plan clearly showed a clustered index seek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://sqlinthewild.co.za/index.php/2009/01/27/a-bookmark-lookup-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sqlinthewild.co.za/?p=199#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying, not entirely successfully, to use Key Lookup when referring to... that thing... that&#039;s not a bookmark lookup. I presented on Saturday and vacillated between the two terms so much I&#039;m sure I confused people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying, not entirely successfully, to use Key Lookup when referring to&#8230; that thing&#8230; that&#8217;s not a bookmark lookup. I presented on Saturday and vacillated between the two terms so much I&#8217;m sure I confused people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
